Brazil-Canada Tax Guide
A practical guide to the tax framework governing transactions, investments and individuals operating between Brazil and Canada, two major economies with no bilateral tax treaty in force.
Contact Us
Our Brazil Tax Guide covers the complete Brazilian tax system: corporate taxes, indirect taxes, employment taxes, the tax reform transition and the key obligations for foreign investors.
Two major economies, no tax treaty, and two very different corporate tax systems.
Brazil and Canada have no bilateral tax treaty in force, despite substantial two-way trade and investment in mining, agribusiness, financial services and infrastructure. Businesses must navigate each country's domestic rules independently, with no treaty-reduced withholding, no permanent establishment safe harbour, and no bilateral mutual agreement procedure to resolve a transfer pricing or residence dispute. Canada's federal-provincial corporate tax system, its foreign affiliate regime, and its FAPI anti-deferral rules meaningfully shape how a Brazilian relationship should be structured.
This guide covers Brazilian withholding income taxes on outbound payments to Canadian recipients, how those taxes stack on a single transaction, Canada's taxation of Brazil-sourced income (the foreign tax credit, the foreign affiliate exempt-surplus regime, and the FAPI rules for passive income), transfer pricing, and structuring considerations. Brazil's IRRF at 10% on dividends under Law 15,270/2025 is the primary withholding cost on the Brazilian side of a dividend flow.
Having no DTA does not mean being double-taxed, but it does mean paying closer attention.
Canada has an extensive treaty network of more than 90 countries; Brazil is a notable gap. Negotiations toward a Brazil-Canada treaty have been periodically discussed but have not produced a ratified instrument. In practice, Canada's unilateral foreign tax credit under section 126 of the Income Tax Act and its foreign affiliate exempt-surplus regime prevent double taxation in most well-structured arrangements, so the absence of a treaty is more of a planning constraint than an automatic double-tax outcome.
The more significant consequence is the absence of a mutual agreement procedure: if the Canada Revenue Agency and the Federal Revenue Department adjust the same transaction in different directions, the resulting double taxation must be resolved through domestic proceedings in each country, with no treaty-based arbitration backstop.
Both Brazil and Canada participate in the OECD Common Reporting Standard and are signatories to the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. The CRA and Receita Federal exchange financial account data on their respective residents annually. The absence of a DTA does not reduce either authority's visibility into cross-border structures.
The main taxes that affect cross-border operations
The following taxes arise in virtually every substantive business relationship between Canadian and Brazilian entities. Each operates independently; satisfying one obligation does not reduce or eliminate any other.
No single mechanism eliminates double taxation between Canada and Brazil. Every cross-border payment stream must be modelled from both sides, applying each country's domestic rules independently, and Canadian investors should test the foreign affiliate exempt-surplus rules before assuming any Brazilian dividend carries a further Canadian tax cost.
The 34% headline rate is not what most Brazilian companies actually pay
The 34% combined IRPJ/CSLL rate applies under the Actual Profit regime, where tax is calculated on audited net profit. Many Brazilian companies instead use the Deemed Profit regime, which produces substantially lower effective rates, a gap that matters directly to how a Canadian parent classifies the subsidiary's surplus pools and assesses FAPI exposure.
A Brazilian operating subsidiary earning active business income and taxed under either regime generally generates exempt surplus for a Canadian corporate shareholder, regardless of the exact effective rate, because the exempt-surplus rules turn on the character of the income (active business) rather than the Brazilian tax rate itself. The Brazilian tax rate becomes relevant mainly where the subsidiary earns passive or FAPI-type income, which is taxed to the Canadian shareholder currently regardless of Brazilian tax paid, subject to a foreign accrual tax credit.
Brazilian withholding income taxes on payments to Canadian recipients
Brazil imposes Withholding Income Tax (IRRF) on most categories of income paid to non-resident recipients, including Canadian entities and individuals. Canada is not on Brazil's list of low-tax jurisdictions, so standard rates apply.
Other Brazilian taxes that apply alongside the IRRF
2026 is the first transitional year of Brazil's new dual-GST system, introduced by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 and regulated by Complementary Law 214/2025. Full abolition of PIS and COFINS begins in 2027, with IBS replacing ICMS and ISS through 2033. CBS and IBS are structurally comparable to Canada's federal GST and the provincial HST, though the Canadian system layers federal and provincial rates rather than a single combined rate. See our Brazil tax reform guide for a full overview.
How Brazilian taxes stack up on a single transaction
When a Brazilian entity makes a payment to a Canadian recipient, multiple Brazilian taxes can apply simultaneously. The examples below use a base contract value of CAD 100,000 and standard non-cumulative rates. IOF is excluded given its variability.
{{ r.note }}
Importing physical goods into Brazil
The examples above apply to financial flows and services. Physical goods exported from Canada into Brazil face a separate and cumulative customs and indirect tax regime, including Import Tax (II), IPI, PIS/COFINS-Import at goods rates, and ICMS on a grossed-up base. Canada has no free trade agreement with Brazil or Mercosur, so the full Mercosur Common External Tariff (TEC) applies. The combined burden typically adds 40-70% or more to the CIF value.
{{ ir.note }}
These are simplified illustrations. The actual tax burden depends on the classification of the payment, whether the underlying income is active or passive for Canadian purposes, whether the Brazilian entity is on the Actual Profit or Deemed Profit regime, IOF rates at the time of currency conversion, and the impact of Brazil's indirect taxes reform during the transition. These figures illustrate the stacking effect and are not a substitute for transaction-specific advice.
Canadian taxation of Brazil-sourced income
Canada taxes its resident corporations and individuals on worldwide income. Brazil-sourced income received directly is subject to Canadian income tax, with relief through the foreign tax credit under section 126 of the Income Tax Act. Where income flows through a Brazilian corporation, the foreign affiliate rules and the FAPI regime dominate the analysis.
Canadian residents who pay foreign income or profits tax on foreign-sourced income may claim a credit against Canadian tax, limited to the Canadian tax otherwise payable on that income, computed separately for business and non-business income.
A Brazilian company in which a Canadian corporation holds 10%+ of the votes and value is a foreign affiliate. Dividends paid out of the affiliate's exempt surplus, broadly, active business income earned in Brazil (a treaty-exempt or designated treaty country is not required for exempt surplus where the affiliate is resident and carries on business in a country Canada has a tax treaty or TIEA with; Brazil does not currently have either), are deductible in computing the Canadian recipient's taxable income.
Passive income of a controlled foreign affiliate (interest, most rents and royalties, and non-active-business capital gains) is attributed currently to Canadian shareholders holding 10%+ interests under the FAPI rules, generating taxable surplus rather than exempt surplus, with a foreign accrual tax credit for underlying Brazilian tax.
Because Brazil has neither a tax treaty nor a tax information exchange agreement with Canada, a Brazilian foreign affiliate's active business income does not automatically generate exempt surplus in the same straightforward way it would for a designated treaty country. Canadian tax advice should confirm the applicable surplus classification and any available relief (including underlying foreign tax credits or the taxable surplus/foreign accrual tax credit mechanism) before assuming a Brazilian dividend will be tax-free in Canada, this is the single most important structuring question for a Canadian group operating in Brazil.
Capital gains on disposal of Brazilian shares
A Canadian corporation disposing of shares in a Brazilian foreign affiliate may realise an exempt capital gain to the extent the gain is attributable to the affiliate's exempt surplus, added to exempt surplus rather than taxed. Gains attributable to taxable surplus are included in income, generally with only half taxable for a capital gain in the ordinary domestic rules, alongside a foreign tax credit for the Brazilian IRRF withheld on the disposal (15% up to BRL 5m, rising to 22.5% above BRL 30m).
Two OECD-aligned systems, no bilateral dispute resolution
Both Brazil and Canada apply transfer pricing rules aligned with the OECD arm's-length standard. The absence of a DTA means there is no mutual agreement procedure to resolve disputes arising from transfer pricing adjustments in either country, and no bilateral advance pricing agreement mechanism.
Brazil's new transfer pricing rules
Law 14,596/2023 and IN RFB 2,161/2023 replaced Brazil's former fixed-margin transfer pricing system with rules fully aligned with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, effective from 2024.
Canada's transfer pricing rules
Under section 247 of the Income Tax Act, the CRA requires contemporaneous documentation for cross-border related-party transactions, with a specific transfer pricing penalty where adjustments exceed prescribed thresholds and documentation was not prepared on time.
Canada's thin capitalisation rules under section 18(4) of the Income Tax Act deny interest deductions on related-party debt exceeding a 1.5:1 debt-to-equity ratio for the Canadian borrower. Brazil separately limits related-party interest deductions under Law 12,249/2010 where debt exceeds twice the creditor-attributable net equity. Intercompany loans between Canada and Brazil must satisfy both regimes independently, and interest paid to a Brazilian lender may also be subject to Canadian non-resident withholding tax at 25% absent an applicable domestic exemption, since no treaty-reduced rate is available.
Structuring considerations for Canadian investors in Brazil
In the absence of a DTA, the holding structure chosen for a Canadian investment in Brazil has a direct and material impact on whether Brazilian earnings can be repatriated to Canada without an incremental Canadian tax cost.
Holding structure
Key takeaways for Canadian investors
Need advice on your Brazil-Canada tax structure?
The interaction of Brazilian and Canadian tax rules in the absence of a DTA requires careful, transaction-specific analysis. Contact us to discuss your situation.
More bilateral tax guides
All Guides →This guide is a general overview only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Tax laws in both countries change frequently. The specific tax treatment of any transaction depends on the facts, the structure adopted and the current state of the law in each jurisdiction. Obtain specific legal and tax advice before structuring any cross-border transaction.
Brazilian lawyers for foreign companies, investors and law firms.