Brazil-Norway Tax Treaty Guide
A brand-new, fully OECD-aligned treaty in force since 30 December 2024, replacing the 1981 original. The first Brazilian treaty with a dedicated offshore-activities article.
Contact Us
Signed on 4 November 2022 and promulgated for Brazil by Decree 12,406/2025, the new treaty entirely replaces the original 1980 treaty (Decree 86,710/1981, amended in 2019) and builds in a principal purpose test, a most-favoured-nation clause, and Brazil's first dedicated offshore-activities article.
Brazil replaced its 1981 treaty with Norway wholesale rather than patching it, and offshore petroleum activity got its own article for the first time.
Brazil and Norway signed a brand-new double tax agreement on 4 November 2022, replacing the original treaty that had been in force since 1981 (itself lightly amended in 2019). Both governments completed their domestic procedures by late 2024 and the new treaty entered into force on 30 December 2024, taking effect from 1 January 2025 and promulgated for Brazil by Decree 12,406/2025. Rather than a protocol grafted onto old text, this is a full OECD-standard rewrite, and it introduces provisions Brazil had not used in any prior treaty, most notably a dedicated article on offshore petroleum and seabed activities, reflecting Norway's position as a major offshore energy jurisdiction and Brazil's own pre-salt operations.
This guide covers what the new treaty provides (including the 10% caps on royalties and technical service fees, the offshore permanent establishment rule, and the most-favoured-nation clause), Brazilian withholding income taxes on outbound payments to Norwegian recipients, how those taxes stack on a single transaction, Norwegian corporate taxation of Brazil-sourced income (the participation exemption, the credit method and the NOKUS CFC rules), transfer pricing, and structuring considerations.
What the 2022 treaty actually provides
Because the treaty is new, it is built on current OECD and UN model language and BEPS-era anti-abuse standards, unlike most of Brazil's older European treaties. It also expressly carves domestic anti-avoidance rules (thin capitalisation, CFC legislation) out of its scope, meaning it does not override either country's own defensive rules.
A Norwegian company carrying on exploration or exploitation of the seabed, subsoil or natural resources in Brazil for more than 30 days within any 12-month period is deemed to have a Brazilian permanent establishment, with related companies' offshore activity periods aggregated to prevent splitting a single project across entities to stay under the threshold. Employment income of a Norwegian resident performing such offshore work in Brazil for more than 30 days in 12 months may also be taxed in Brazil, and capital gains on the sale of exploration or exploitation rights, related offshore property, or shares deriving most of their value from such rights or property, may be taxed in both states. This is the first time Brazil has included offshore-specific PE language in a tax treaty (a similar clause exists in the not-yet-effective Brazil-UK treaty).
The main taxes that affect cross-border operations
The following taxes arise in virtually every substantive business relationship between Norwegian and Brazilian entities. Each operates independently; satisfying one obligation does not reduce or eliminate any other.
The treaty resolves double taxation on royalties, technical service fees and (via the credit method) most other income; it does not touch Brazilian indirect taxes, IOF, Norwegian VAT, or either country's domestic anti-avoidance regime. Every cross-border payment stream still needs to be modelled against the full domestic tax stack on both sides.
The 34% headline rate is not what most Brazilian companies actually pay
The 34% combined IRPJ/CSLL rate applies under the Actual Profit regime, where tax is calculated on audited net profit. Many Brazilian companies instead use the Deemed Profit regime, which produces substantially lower effective rates and matters directly to a Norwegian parent assessing NOKUS exposure and Pillar Two obligations.
The treaty expressly states it does not affect Norway's controlled foreign company legislation (NOKUS, Skatteloven §§10-60 to 10-68). A Brazilian subsidiary taxed under the Deemed Profit regime, with a correspondingly low effective rate, may still be caught if Norwegian shareholders control it and its effective tax rate is below two-thirds of the Norwegian nominal rate, unless a genuine business activity exemption applies. Norway also applies a Pillar Two global minimum tax from financial years beginning in 2024, relevant to Norwegian-headed groups with low-taxed Brazilian subsidiaries.
Brazilian withholding income taxes on payments to Norwegian recipients
Brazil imposes Withholding Income Tax (IRRF) on most categories of income paid to non-resident recipients. Where the new treaty caps a rate below the Brazilian domestic rate, the treaty rate applies, subject to Norwegian residency certification and the treaty's principal purpose test.
Other Brazilian taxes that apply alongside the IRRF
2026 is the first transitional year of Brazil's new dual-GST system, introduced by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 and regulated by Complementary Law 214/2025. Full abolition of PIS and COFINS begins in 2027, with IBS replacing ICMS and ISS through 2033. None of this is affected by the treaty, which addresses income taxes only. See our Brazil tax reform guide for a full overview.
How Brazilian taxes stack up on a single transaction
When a Brazilian entity makes a payment to a Norwegian recipient, multiple Brazilian taxes can apply simultaneously. The examples below use a base contract value of NOK 1,000,000 and standard non-cumulative rates. IOF is excluded given its variability.
{{ r.note }}
Importing physical goods into Brazil
The examples above apply to financial flows and services. Physical goods exported from Norway into Brazil face a separate and cumulative customs and indirect tax regime, entirely outside the treaty's scope: Import Tax (II), IPI, PIS/COFINS-Import at goods rates, and ICMS on a grossed-up base. Norway is not an EU member and has no free trade agreement with Brazil or Mercosur; the EFTA-Mercosur free trade agreement, signed in 2025 but not yet ratified by Brazil, would eventually phase down tariffs on most Norwegian-origin industrial goods once in force. The combined burden currently adds 40-70% or more to the CIF value.
{{ ir.note }}
These are simplified illustrations. The actual tax burden depends on the classification of the payment under the treaty, whether the offshore-activities article 23 applies, the Norwegian participation exemption and NOKUS position, IOF rates at the time of conversion, and the Brazilian entity's tax regime. These figures illustrate the stacking effect and are not a substitute for transaction-specific advice.
Norwegian taxation of Brazil-sourced income
Norway taxes its resident companies on worldwide income at a flat 22%. Brazil-sourced income received by Norwegian companies is subject to Norwegian corporate income tax, with relief available through the participation exemption (fritaksmetoden), the credit method both under the treaty and domestically, and the NOKUS controlled-company rules.
Dividends and capital gains on shares in EEA companies are exempt for a Norwegian corporate shareholder without a minimum holding. The exemption also extends to non-EEA holdings, including Brazilian shares, provided Brazil is not treated as a low-tax jurisdiction under Norwegian rules; a genuine business activity requirement applies to guard against portfolio-style abuse of the exemption.
Where the exemption does not apply, Norway credits qualifying Brazilian IRRF against Norwegian tax on the same income, both under the treaty's own relief article and under Norway's general unilateral credit rules. The credit is limited to the Norwegian tax attributable to the Brazilian-source income, calculated per income category.
A Brazilian company controlled by Norwegian shareholders is a NOKUS entity if it is low-taxed (broadly, an effective rate below two-thirds of the Norwegian rate) and Norwegian shareholders control it, attributing its income currently to those shareholders. The treaty expressly does not limit this rule. An operating Brazilian company on the Actual Profit regime, taxed at 34%, will not typically be caught.
A Norwegian company disposing of qualifying Brazilian shares under the participation exemption has no Norwegian tax on the gain, but the treaty preserves Brazil's right to tax the gain at source, and, for offshore-related shares, expressly permits taxation in both states. The Brazilian IRRF on disposal (15% up to BRL 5m, rising to 22.5% above BRL 30m) is therefore usually a real, uncredited cost from the Norwegian side once the exemption applies.
Transfer pricing: two OECD-aligned systems with a modern MAP
Both Brazil and Norway apply transfer pricing rules aligned with the OECD arm's-length standard, and, being a post-BEPS instrument, the new treaty's mutual agreement procedure reflects current OECD dispute-resolution standards more closely than Brazil's older European treaties.
Brazil's new transfer pricing rules
Law 14,596/2023 and IN RFB 2,161/2023 replaced Brazil's former fixed-margin transfer pricing system with rules fully aligned with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, effective from 2024.
Norway's transfer pricing rules
Norwegian transfer pricing rules under Skatteloven §13-1 and the documentation requirements in the Tax Administration Act require larger companies with cross-border related-party transactions to prepare contemporaneous OECD-standard documentation. The Norwegian Tax Administration (Skatteetaten) can adjust taxable income where pricing departs from the arm's-length standard.
The treaty expressly confirms it does not limit either country's domestic thin capitalisation rules. Norway caps net interest deductions at 25% of tax EBITDA for related-party debt under Skatteloven §6-41, with a NOK 5 million safe-harbour threshold. Brazil separately limits related-party interest deductions under Law 12,249/2010 where debt exceeds twice the creditor-attributable net equity. Intercompany loans between Norway and Brazil must satisfy both regimes independently.
Structuring considerations for Norwegian investors in Brazil
The new treaty's principal purpose test means treaty-shopping structures set up mainly to obtain treaty benefits are vulnerable to challenge; structuring decisions should be driven by genuine commercial and holding rationale, not just rate arbitrage.
Holding structure
Key takeaways for Norwegian investors
Need advice on your Brazil-Norway tax structure?
The new treaty, the offshore-activities article and its interaction with Brazilian and Norwegian domestic rules requires careful, transaction-specific analysis. Contact us to discuss your situation.
More bilateral tax guides
All Guides →This guide is a general overview only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Tax laws in both countries change frequently. The specific tax treatment of any transaction depends on the facts, the structure adopted and the current state of the law in each jurisdiction. Obtain specific legal and tax advice before structuring any cross-border transaction.
Brazilian lawyers for foreign companies, investors and law firms.